Mcafee firefox plugin

I've changed the way I charge my iPhone. You should, too. Time for a Linux smartphone? Best iPhones : Which model is right for you? Windows Do these six things right away after you finish setup.

Developers are in short supply. Here are the skills and programming languages employers need. Best Apple iPad deals available right now: January Best keyboard Because you deserve better. The painful shame of owning an Android phone.

You agree to receive updates, promotions, and alerts from ZDNet. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to receive the selected newsletter s which you may unsubscribe from at any time. Problem escalated.

We deleted and re-installed both True Key and Firefox. Search Support Search. Home Support Forums Firefox I can't find a plug-in, extension or Learn More. Chosen solution After a third call from McAfee escalated support, they found and installed Firefox add-on - after uninstalling and re-installing True Key. Chosen Solution After a third call from McAfee escalated support, they found and installed Firefox add-on - after uninstalling and re-installing True Key. Or - you don't think that we pay for it when congress authorizes it?

You should see AVG. This is the "System" process, not all processes, mind ya. I am pretty sure that both McAfee and Firefox is at fault here. Or, FF assumes that the plugins written for it return valid data. Not too bad an assumption, hmm? That is a very bad assumption. You validate the data and reject it if it doesn't match the published API. If you accept data unconditionally and your app crashes as a result, the majority of the blame is with you. I say this so often it should be in my sig There is absurdly little difference between so-called "anti-virus" and desktop "internet security" products and the malware from which they are supposed to protect you.

When family members ask me how I manage to happily use a 5 year-old PC that seems to be faster than their year-old PC, I simply say "I don't have anti-virus installed". It also depends on what anti-virus you have installed.

Some such as Norton and McAffee are worse than most viruses. Some aren't nearly as bloated and heavy and don't impart much impact on typical use. No way in hell are people - myself included - going to think that a slow computer is better than any alternative.

I've already dropped a couple remarks about Linux. Let's just suppose for a moment that Linux desktops are targeted in the next several months, and our virus environment gets to be as bad as Windows.

Will I install a resource hog like McAfee or Symantec? No way. Instead, I'll shut down services, encrypt everything, only use HTTPS - you know, all those "best practices" things that the real sec. If Free Software ever actually needs anti-virus, it will bear little resemblance to the nightmare that is AV on Windows. The only reason for the heavyweight crap is marketing bullet points. If your browser is isolated and your email is isolated, and you scan removable media, you won't get a virus. There's no need to hook the entire OS and scan every file as it's opened or any junk like that.

There would probably be a libav. It's generally more secure than the desktop releases, due to "default" settings. Even if it's not more secure, the wife and kids don't know how to navigate in it, so they won't even want to get on it.

I ran Win for a good while, converted to desktop use. It was actually pretty nice, with all the lockdowns in place. I suppose this is where you'll tell me that I should look at Win7. I have. It's a definite improvement over XP and Vista, but it's not much of an improvement over How often did your AV actually block a virus that would have been executed otherwise this questions excludes emails with attachments that you would have never opened? It never has happened to me within the last 10 years.

So what's the value of an AV for a user, who knows what he does? However, I have seen many people with AV that have been infected nevertheless especially by downloading and installing games from dubious sources. So, what's the value of an AV, if some viruses come through? This doesn't tell the whole story. The reason you don't have issues is the same reason you don't feel you need AV software -- you don't do stupid stuff on your computer. If users would take the time to read what comes up in their screen instead of just clicking it as quickly as they can to get rid of it and use a little common sense, nobody would need AV.

If users weren't so stupid, we'd probably see more hackers attempting to find security holes in the software. True for you. True for me. Not true for most of my family who will happily click every link in sight. I don't want to right click and temporarily allow the cdn!

I just wanna tend mah crawps! Everyone here knows how it goes: I ended up being the unofficial tech support for all my friends and family. Even after swearing that I didn't know much about Windows, I accidentally helped someone clean up their PC and word got around.

AVG i've had no problems with, although for the last few months it pops up with a "AVG Security Update" that sends you to a "Look what we protected you against" page that attempts to validate it's worth. It presents it's global statistics I think as statistics relating to you alone. Making you think you've really, nearly, had 12, attacks in the last month. Fewer people are going to, with their boneheaded moves of late. I don't use anything McAfee makes, but after breaking so many plugins, perhaps the better advice would be "disable Firefox".

Genuine curiosity here, how many plugins do you use? I keep hearing about Firefox breaking a bazillion plugins every single time, yet I have never had it happen to me. I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing so different. That surprises me, I haven't had much trouble at all with Firefox in years.

It seems to have more trouble on Linux, but even there it doesn't crash that often. I would go so far as to say 3. Firefox 7, if you have not tried it, is very good. I can't stand Chrome for more than 5 minutes.

A new account would suggest that he'd just signed up to shill for Mozilla. Although, you can look at his posting history and see that he was complimenting Chrome not too long ago, so he's probably genuine. Followed by "You are horribly out of date.

Firefox is three days old. The current version is Would you like to download the update? And immediately after the relaunch, "You are horribly out of date. Would you like to download th. Doesn't mean it can't do bit math. Firefox leaks memory like a sieve and is extremely unstable. Chrome just works. Firefox has been running here for over a week with seven windows and about twenty-five tabs open. Chrome hands your soul to Google. Hmm, which would I prefer?

I've rarely seen a crash and the RAM usage seems reasonable for the number of pages it has open. Of course I do have noscript installed, but everyone should do that if they don't want their computer pwned by a remote exploit. There was a version of FireFox recently that had a bad memory leak. I used to need to restart it nearly every other day. That seems to have been fixed, though.

Go open at least tabs to random pages and then start your normal browsing. Yes, because opening tabs to random pages is normal web browser usage and Firefox shouldn't need more than 2MB of RAM to do so.

At that point my system becomes so slow due to having only 3GB of total RAM that editing this post causes the system to pause for about 5 seconds after every 10 or so characters typed. So, I restart Firefox and it's OK again for a day. But, if I leave it running overnight right after a restart with just those 3 tabs open, by the next morning it's at MB. Hopefully, it crashes Chrome or IE too.

It'd be a shame for only Firefox users to uninstall needless software. As one would expect of a security company whose name sounds like it belongs on the McDonald's dollar menu and served with cream.

McAfee couldn't stop salmonella.